Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 12 results ...

Anastasopoulos, P C, Labi, S, Bhargava, A, Bordat, C and Mannering, F L (2010) Frequency of Change Orders in Highway Construction Using Alternate Count-Data Modeling Methods. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(08), 886–93.

El Asmar, M, Lotfallah, W, Whited, G and Hanna, A S (2010) Quantitative Methods for Design-Build Team Selection. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(08), 904–12.

Ji, S, Park, M and Lee, H (2010) Data Preprocessing–Based Parametric Cost Model for Building Projects: Case Studies of Korean Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(08), 844–53.

Kent, D C and Becerik-Gerber, B (2010) Understanding Construction Industry Experience and Attitudes toward Integrated Project Delivery. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(08), 815–25.

Kim, B and Reinschmidt, K F (2010) Probabilistic Forecasting of Project Duration Using Kalman Filter and the Earned Value Method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(08), 834–43.

Korkmaz, S, Riley, D and Horman, M (2010) Piloting Evaluation Metrics for Sustainable High-Performance Building Project Delivery. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(08), 877–85.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Buildings; Sustainable development; Construction industry; Project management; Project delivery; Buildings; Sustainable development; Construction industry; Project management; Quantitative analysis; Delivery;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000195
  • Abstract:
    Sustainable high-performance buildings are being more widely adopted around the world to reduce energy costs and improve the well being of occupants. To achieve the set goals for these building projects within realistic financial and time constraints, superior planning, design, and construction processes are needed. The available literature lacks the descriptive project delivery metrics identifying scientific methods for providing insight or feedback about the performance of project delivery processes for sustainable high-performance buildings. This paper describes an exploratory study examining more than 100 variables in green project delivery to scientifically identify important metrics. Limited by a rather small sample due to the relatively young market of green buildings, the outcome of this paper, nevertheless, provides important direction for the continued development of meaningful metrics to assist in the establishment of a decision making support tool for project teams to facilitate optimum project delivery processes for sustainable high-performance buildings.

Lai, A W Y and Pang, P S M (2010) Measuring Performance for Building Maintenance Providers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(08), 864–76.

Mostafavi, A and Karamouz, M (2010) Selecting Appropriate Project Delivery System: Fuzzy Approach with Risk Analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(08), 923–30.

Nguyen, L D and Ibbs, W (2010)  Case Law and Variations in Cumulative Impact Productivity Claims. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(08), 826–33.

Xu, Y, Chan, A P C and Yeung, J F Y (2010) Developing a Fuzzy Risk Allocation Model for PPP Projects in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(08), 894–903.

Zheng, S and Tiong, R L K (2010) First Public-Private-Partnership Application in Taiwan’s Wastewater Treatment Sector: Case Study of the Nanzih BOT Wastewater Treatment Project. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(08), 913–22.

Zou, P X W, Chen, Y and Chan, T (2010) Understanding and Improving Your Risk Management Capability: Assessment Model for Construction Organizations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(08), 854–63.